AI & EDITORIAL STANDARDS
How the briefing comes together.
Readers deserve to know how an article was produced, where its claims come from, and what its limits are.
Updated October 28, 2026
AI assistance and automatic publication
The Daybook uses ChatGPT to research public sources, organize information, draft articles, and publish the daily edition automatically. Britton Henline operates the publication and sets the editorial requirements. A publisher byline identifies responsibility for the site; it does not mean that every sentence was personally written or reviewed by Britton.
Articles may go live without human review before publication. AI can misread sources, confuse dates, overlook context, or make factual errors. Automated source checks and publishing safeguards reduce some risks but do not establish that every claim is correct.
Our fact-checking process
The publishing guide instructs the automated writer to open and check original sources wherever possible: government statistical releases, Federal Reserve statements, regulatory filings, company announcements, and official policy documents. Reliable journalism helps identify developments and provide context. Search snippets alone are not sufficient support.
The writer is instructed to verify event dates, data reporting periods, numbers, and the status of policy decisions; cross-check major market moves and causal claims; and link directly to supporting sources. Unverifiable claims should be omitted. If the available evidence cannot support a complete edition, the workflow should stop and report the problem instead of filling gaps with invented information.
Publication checks also require source links, substantial article sections, and image-credit fields. Those checks validate the presence and structure of the material, not the truth of every statement. Readers can follow the source links to assess the evidence themselves.
Reporting, context, and analysis
Coverage should distinguish what happened from our explanation of why it matters. Analysis and uncertain implications should be identified as such. A proposed policy is not an enacted law, a forecast is not an observed result, and a stock-price move does not prove a single cause.
Each edition identifies its coverage date. On weekends and market holidays, market figures should be labeled with the date of the relevant trading session. Background material should not be presented as a new event.
Images and attribution
Articles use credited photographs with identified reuse permissions or labeled editorial illustrations. Photo credits link to the source and license when applicable. Archival images are identified as file photos and should not imply they depict the day’s events.
AI-generated illustrations are visual interpretations, not documentary photographs or evidence. Image-rights concerns can be sent through our contact page.
Corrections and updates
If you spot an error, send the article link and supporting information to brittonhenline8@gmail.com. Britton is the contact for reviewing correction requests. Reporting an issue does not automatically change the article.
For a substantive factual correction, our standard is to add a dated correction note explaining what changed. Minor spelling or formatting fixes may be made without a note. Material new developments should be identified as updates rather than silently blended into an earlier day’s reporting.
Purpose and limitations
The Daybook provides general news and educational commentary. It does not provide personalized investment, tax, or legal advice. Coverage of a stock is not a recommendation to buy or sell it, and readers should not assume that the publisher has no holdings in companies mentioned.